7363 v 1.000 Patrick on your right to demand a formal complaint.
This page is http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/Patrick1.html
Other pages by Patrick: None yet.
From Patrick paradoxmagnus @ Yahoo.com
Sent: Feb 15, 2006 7:02 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org
One should DEMAND a VERIFIED COMPLAINT to be safe.
PENAL CODE 853.9. (a) Whenever written notice to appear has been prepared,
delivered, and filed by an officer or the prosecuting attorney with the court
pursuant to the provisions of Section 853.6 of this code, an exact and legible
duplicate copy of the notice when filed with the magistrate, in lieu of a
verified complaint, shall constitute a complaint to which the defendant may
plead "guilty" or "nolo contendere."
If, however, the defendant violates his or her promise to appear in court,
or does not deposit lawful bail, or pleads other than "guilty" or "nolo
contendere" to the offense charged, a complaint shall be filed which shall
conform to the provisions of this code and which shall be deemed to be an
original complaint; and thereafter proceedings shall be had as provided by law,
except that a defendant may, by an agreement in writing, subscribed by him or
her and filed with the court, waive the filing of a verified complaint and elect
that the prosecution may proceed upon a written notice to appear.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (a) of this section,
whenever the written notice to appear has been prepared on a form approved by
the Judicial Council, an exact and legible duplicate copy of the notice when
filed with the magistrate shall constitute a complaint to which the defendant
may enter a plea and, if the notice to appear is verified, upon which a warrant
may be issued. If the notice to appear is not verified, the defendant may, at
the time of arraignment, request that a verified complaint be filed.
And last time I check, the STATE was NOT using the REQUIRED NTA.
Without a VALID COMPLAINT there are JURISDICTIONAL issues.
"In Ralph v. Police Court (1948) 84 Cal.App.2d 257 [190 P.2d 632], and Rupley
v. Johnson (1953) 120 Cal.App.2d 548, 551-552 [261 P.2d 318], it was held that a
defendant cited for and charged with violating a Vehicle Code section, who
pleads not guilty thereto and does not waive the filing of a complaint, is not
brought within the jurisdiction of the court until a verified complaint charging
him with the offense in question has been filed. (To the same effect, see dictum
in [237 Cal.App.2d 73] People v. Agnew (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d Supp. 837, 840 [242
P.2d 410].) The decisions in the above-cited cases were based upon the
provisions of former Vehicle Code, section 739.1, which are now contained
without material change in Vehicle Code, section 40513. Said decisions are
accordingly controlling of the construction to be accorded the latter section.
(Gavin v. Municipal Court (1960) 184 Cal.App.2d 712, 714 [7 Cal.Rptr. 732].)"
Anger v. Municipal Court, 237 Cal.App.2d 69 (1965)
Of course they will use your FAILURE to ASSERT your RIGHT to a VERIFIED
COMPLAINT as a WAIVER and try to CLAIM "harmless error", if you let them.
"As Witkin points out in California Criminal Procedure, section 24, page 28,
"jurisdiction" is a term of multiple meanings. In such cases as Anger v.
Municipal Court, supra, 23 Cal.App.2d 69, it was manifestly not a question of
subject-matter jurisdiction nor of jurisdiction over the person. The defendant
there was voluntarily before the court. What that court was talking about was
jurisdiction to act in accordance with statutory requirements. See the examples
supplied by Witkin, op. cit., supra, at page 32. This is simply a mode of
describing the principle that a court is obliged to act within certain statutory
constraints; it is hazardous to rely on cases employing the word "jurisdiction"
in this sense. See Witkin, op. cit., supra, page 733 for examples of defects of
jurisdiction or due process that are of such magnitude as to require reversal
per se. The instant cases are not of this magnitude.
Remedies Available to a Defendant
The message conveyed byPeople v. Wilson, supra, 60 Cal.2d 139, is that, in
general, such errors must be attacked before trial. The thrust of appellants'
argument herein is that the citation-complaint does not conform either to the
requirements of Penal Code section 853.9, subdivision (b) or to the general
requirements of Penal Code section 950 governing formal complaints. Penal Code
section 1004, subdivision 2 provides that the defendant may demur to the
complaint before entry of a plea when it "does not substantially conform to the
provisions of Sections 950 and 952 ...." Penal Code section 1012 in turn
provides that such objections can be taken only by demurrer, and "failure so to
take it shall be deemed a waiver thereof"--except for objections to the
jurisdiction of the court, a possibility we have already disposed of above. It
might be arguable that a pretrial motion to dismiss should be available in an
unusual case, but that issue is not before us. The provisions of Penal Code
section 1007 highlight the policy of the law favoring liberal amendment: "If the
demurrer is sustained ... the court must, if the defect can be remedied, permit
the filing of an amended complaint within such time not exceeding 10 days as it
may fix." (Italics added.)  If the trial court erroneously overrules the
demurrer or denies leave to amend, the defendant's remedy is by pretrial writ
proceedings. [160 Cal.App.3d Supp. 9] If the writ is erroneously denied, then in
accordance withPeople v. Wilson, supra, 60 Cal.2d 139,there is no appellate
remedy available, unless the appellant can show that he has suffered prejudice.
Such a showing is hard to imagine in cases of this kind. [2b] At all events, the
present appellants did not get over the first hurdle of challenging the error
before trial, by demurrer or otherwise.
The Law Favors Disposition Upon the Merits, Not Upon Procedural Niceties
The California Constitution and the Penal Code make it abundantly clear that,
except in extraordinarily compelling cases, judgments are not to be reversed for
procedural errors. (Cal. Const., art. VI, ? 13; Pen. Code, ?? 960, 1258,
1404 and 1469.) fn. 6" People v. Gompper (1984) 160 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 , 207
Just like they do with everything, ASSENT means CONSENT.
Patrick in California
"Machiavelli would be PROUD, Houdini would be AMAZED and Mark Twain would say
"I told you so."--PKM
--- In email@example.com, Daniel Quackenbush <dquack@... wrote:
Patrick, the prosecution is not required to file another complaint unless the
defendant makes a request for it (even if a request is made, the law may have
changed where a new complaint is not required if the cop signed the ticket under
penalty of perjury). Pleading "not guilty" makes no difference if the defendant
doesn't request a new complaint. The traffic ticket is the complaint in most
circumstances, and the California legislature has said that for the traffic
ticket to be a complaint, the "uniform traffic ticket and summons" must be used.
Crass Promotional Links:
Telephone Lawyerdude: 541 476 8954. Email: Dlawyerdude@Gmail.com Lawyerdude1989@yahoo.com
Please join my newest Yahoo group for discussion or legal self help litigation. Here is the link to the link: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/6346.html
Do you have questions? Join our Discussion group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_lawyerdude
Instant message me: I am lawyerdude1989 on Yahoo instant messenger.
My phone number and email address may change from time to time. If the telephone number or email address on this page is outdated then please join my group http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/the_lawyerdude or migrate to more recent pages. There is a 4 digit number up in the top left corner of the page. Not the counter number. There is often a date at the bottom of the page. Migrate to newer pages to see my newer telephone number and email address.
My most useful web pages and my most popular web pages are these following pages:
Links for your Empowerment! Self help Litigation forms, instructions, cases, and samples.
1. How to Win. Overview. Getting started: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7260.html
2. Over 100 actual winning motions from 22 winning pro se litigators ! http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/traffic.html
3. Motions 101. How to write and file and serve a motion: http://www.fu.gq.nu/6025.html
4. Briefs 101. How to write a Memorandum of Law: http://www.lawyerdude.s5.com/6435memo.html
5. Lawyerdude’s Empowerment page: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/medley.html
6. Your litigation rights page. Learn your litigation rights! http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5687.html
7. Charlie’s Transcripts. Learn how to charm the judge and win your case: http://ronfox.250free.com/charlie.html
8. Learn the law ! Links to the 143 cases that define criminal procedure: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/weinreb.html
9. Eighteen actual Section 1983 federal complaints: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6008.html
10. List of the 30 most important criminal court motions. They are listed in Lawyerdude’s Bill of Rights for Criminal Defendants in jail. This is my New Standard by which to measure effectiveness of counsel. Make your appointed lawyer toe the line: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5635.html
11. Courtroom assertiveness 101: How to be assertive in court. Scripts for the Pro Se litigant:
12. Were you strip searched? Sue em! http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5728.html Do they do a strip search anus check every time you go to the law library? Did your jail not have a law library?
13. List of the most quotable cases and the most useful web pages for the pro se Litigator: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/medley.html
14. Your case summary and trial notebook form: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/summary.html
15. My Demurrer page: perfect record so far: http://lawyerdude.8k.com/5736.html
All about Lawyerdude
16. My winning argument regarding the 1st amendment where I argued the Law to the jury without interruption: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/5918.html
17. My ongoing battle with the mistaken, oppressive, and political state bar: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com
18. Lawyerdudes’s biographical page: http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/mystory.html
19. My LSD story and brief: http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5431.html
20. How to work well with Lawyerdude: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/contract.html
21. My most important page. My top 10 lists: http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5459.html
22. My ideas. My 10 proposed amendments to the bill of rights: http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5123.html
23. My home page: http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com Or my mirror site: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com
24. List of my 200 most popular web pages according to Google. http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5733.html
My biggest fattest briefs:
25. My “state bar acts are unconstitutional!” brief: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/3789.html
26. My 100 page LSD brief: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/1170.html Use this for your drug case!
27. My collection of “right to drive” briefs: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/right2drive.html
28. Lawyerdude's briefs: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com
More Lawyerdude links and Recommended Reading list
29. Lawyerdude’s traffic page: http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5259.html
30. Lawyerdude's library. A prioritized reading list. A list of books that farm folk and an enlightened populace should read. Some of these books justify weekly or monthly review - like your Bible - for your own defense. http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/library.html
31. List of links to the Latest uploads from Lawyerdude: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5673.html
32. Lawyerdude's Contemporary Constitutional Issues: http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/5693.html
33. Lawyerdude's links page: http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/links.html
34. Lawyer’s Manifesto: http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5753.html
People who link to me:
35. I thank Bill Munro http://www.landrights.com I thank http://www.commonlawvenue.com/ .